• Connect to CKNW
Related Links

BC Conservative Party candidate speaks out against Enbridge proposal
VANCOUVER/CKNW(AM980)
Shane Woodford | Email news tips to shane.woodford@corusent.com
2/16/2013

The BC Conservative Party and Leader John Cummins are all for the Enbridge Northern Gateway Oil Pipeline but a candidate is breaking ranks.

Kelowna Lake Country candidate Graem James says he just can't support the Enbridge proposal.

"I just don't think Enbridge is a company to build that pipeline they have had concerns there has been 600 spills I know they are old pipelines but there response to those spills has not been adequate and I am not willing to have a company like that built such an important pipeline through the interior of BC."

James says he told party brass and his leader he was going public with his views and they said no problem.

He says the provincial government has been sitting on the sidelines instead of providing leadership where it concerns Enbridge.


 «  Return to previous page
 »  Send to a friend
Subscribe to channel

Leave a comment:

showing all comments · Subscribe to comments
Comment Like
  • 45
  1. ChrisM_18 posted on 02/16/2013 05:02 AM
    Good for Mr James and finally some flexibility by JC - is there hope for this party ?
    1. DougB_25 posted on 02/16/2013 01:42 PM
      @ChrisM_18 No real hope.Cummins blew this by not putting all of this together when the NDP was down to two seats.THAT is when he should have struck.Now he is stuck with trying to please all of the people.And he's trying to do that by saying he will listen to what people want,AFTER the election.No where does he say what he will do if people on Vancouver Island want this.People in the north want that..And people in the lower mainland want some thing entirely different.It's easy to say that "we will speak for the people".But when we the people are not all the same,you MUST ask ,"which people" will you listern to today?
      Also,guess what? Most of us are not qualified to run much of anything. With that in mind,do you really want a leader that wants you to tell him what to do,in spite of your own lack of expertise? If all they do is what we tell them to do,they are not LEADING.They are following
  2. bctaxpayer posted on 02/16/2013 07:21 AM
    Go for it John you have a lot of support out there a lot more the the corrupt BC lie BERALS think led by a arrogant corrupt un elected leader.
    1. commonsense posted on 02/16/2013 08:13 AM
      @bctaxpayer Why do you keep saying unelected leader? She was elected by her riding. She is an elected premier.
  3. KellyS_2296 posted on 02/16/2013 07:57 AM
    That's one of the great things about the BC Conservatives, part of their policy is that MLA's can speak up for their constituents. They don't have to vote with the party majority, unlike all other political parties at all levels of government.

    If all of the people who keep speaking against the BCCP as a viable option in the upcoming election would just read through their policy document, basically do some research before just automatically slamming them as a choice, I think they would see that the BCCP would be a great option as the MAJORITY party in BC.
    1. bctaxpayer posted on 02/16/2013 08:49 AM
      @KellyS_2296 Well said.
    2. AnneH_4 posted on 02/16/2013 09:06 AM
      @KellyS_2296 You are right of course but people nowadays do NO RESEARCH. They listen to media sound bites.

      i met an intelligent person last night who didnt like a certain politician - totally based on how that politician delivered speeches - She did not know of the proposed policies etc.....
  4. SusanJ_2218 posted on 02/16/2013 10:04 AM
    Good for Mr . James one good guy in one bad party still very bad odds. Once into power the conservatives would be just as mean spirited as their federal counterpart . The conservatives care about money first people last.
    1. KellyS_2296 posted on 02/16/2013 10:23 AM
      @SusanJ_2218 Oh, and the fiberals are putting people first and money last are they? And how about the ndp? If you're in a union, the ndp will look after you, otherwise, you are SOL.
      The BC Conservatives aren't affiliated with the federal conservatives, that's the BC fiberals' job.
    2. Giepher posted on 02/16/2013 03:18 PM
      @SusanJ_2218 As I saw it John Cummins wasn't much for the party liner, when it came to the Fed Cons and although I can't deny the existance of mean spiritiveness - it's all around us. Just look what the BCLIBS did to the BCNDP after Glenn Clark's loss. Money seems to be what makes the world go round and it is this curse and cross we must all bear, whether you have it or not; but it is what you do with it, whether you have it or not; that makes all the difference in the world - We're all in charge of our own legacy, good bad or indifferent. Are the richest in the world just selfish, or are just uncaring?
  5. Specimen Yarp posted on 02/16/2013 10:35 AM
    I am a member of the BC Conservative Party and support the pipeline. However I also support members, candidates and leaders to speak their mind and not tow the party line if they do not believe in it or their constituents don't believe in it. People are elected to serve the people, not the party.
    1. bctaxpayer posted on 02/16/2013 11:22 AM
      @Specimen Yarp That's something you cannot do if you are a BC lie beral.
  6. MichaelD_10 posted on 02/16/2013 11:33 AM
    I believe the only choice for BC is a Conservative government. I also support the pipe line. Provincially we don't have to worry about the pipe line because the feds have the power to push it through regardless of what the city folk of Vancouver want.
    This is the most support for the Conservatives I have seen on this website. Hopefully this is just the start of something positive. If the free enterprise vote splits between Liberal and Conservative, Mr. Dix will be our next premiere. Then the folks that like to redistribute wealth will be at the wheel and those that create wealth will go elsewhere, at least as long as BC has the threat of an NDP government.
    1. ChrisM_18 posted on 02/16/2013 11:51 AM
      @MichaelD_10 I think there are a lot of us who know better than to vote NDP, but in good concscience couldn't vote for Christy and her ragtag band of crooks. I've been looking for an alternative but am put off by John Cummings .Now knowing that my MLA wouldn't always have to follow John's lead .... I'm more interested
  7. MichaelD_10 posted on 02/16/2013 11:53 AM
    Do you think the princes of Commerce supported Christye because they new she would push everyone's nose out of joint. The purpose being to get loyal Liberals to jump to the other free enterprise party.

    Lots of sneaky stuff going on now days.

    I was so surprised when the Liberals picked Christye for their leader. Didn't anyone listen to her talk radio show? It was clear to me.
    1. bctaxpayer posted on 02/16/2013 12:29 PM
      @MichaelD_10 Risky the Milf is the worst choice the BC lie beral party could have made. Have you ever seen a more arrogant photo op queen?????
  8. joes_2868 posted on 02/16/2013 12:22 PM
    commonsense: Notice how Adrian Dix says that he will not use anything negative against the Liberals MLA's in the campaign. That's because NDP'er's like bctaxpayer is doing it for him.
    Bctaxpayer seems to forget that Ed Stelmach, Ralph Klein,and Alison Redford in Alberta, Greg Selinger in Manitoba, Kathy Dunderdale in Newfoundland, and Ujjal Dosanjh in B.C. were all elected as premier's within their own party before calling provincial elections.
    These NDP'er's constantly blow gaskets and shoot from the hip. UNBELIEVABLE, BUT TRUE!
    1. bctaxpayer posted on 02/16/2013 12:35 PM
      @joes_2868 Why don't you make some comments about risky's mentor and your buddy you know corrupt gordo Scambell boy did he leave us a mess.Our grand children grand children will still be paying down the Prov. debt the the corrupt BC lie BERALS have acquired.And these current lie BERALS are no better.
    2. LeonW posted on 02/16/2013 03:50 PM
      @joes_2868 What a whiner. You're suggesting that regular people
      A: Don't dislike Clark and B: Wouldn't say something on anonymous message board if they didn't like her.

      Strikes me as kind of silly. And if Dix doesn't have to do any negative ads cause people are doing it for him what does that tell you?
  9. joes_2868 posted on 02/16/2013 01:11 PM
    ChrisM_18: That's right. Cummins is not the answer. If the Liberals have to go, the NDP are not the answer. The proper thing to do is to put both the Liberals and NDP in opposition status.
    The voting is polarized. Voters go to the voting poll with the intentions of who they want to vote for and some change their mind because they are worried that a party might form government, so they change their choice of party.
    If the total voters went to the voting booth and elected for exactly who they had in mind, there is a very good chance, that B.C. would have a minority government.
    This next election will be decided on the swing ridings. These swing ridings can go either way. In the 2009 election these ridings were won by under 5% difference between the Liberals and the NDP.
    There are 17 swing ridings. In the 2009 election, 10 were won by the Liberals, 6 by the NDP, and 1 by the Independent, that of Vicky Huntington.
    The taxpayers in Nova Scotia had Conservative and Liberal provincial governments.
    Remember that these are the provincial arm of the Federal wings of the party.
    The B.C. Liberals are a coalition of Conservatives and Liberals, just like the Saskatchewan Party in Saskatchewan who are the government in Saskatchewan.
    The Nova Scotia taxpayers decided to take a chance on electing a provincial NDP government in 2009, just to give them a try after many terms of conservative and liberal governments.
    They remember, why not, an election will have to held on their perfomance anyway.
    The NDP won the Nova Scotia election for the first time in history of Nova Scotia politics. They have now destroyed the province and it is time for a provincial election in Nova Scotia once again.
    The outcome of the next election is said to be once again a Liberal provincial government.
    The taxpayers gave the NDP a chance, but they demolished the province.
    Will go down in history, as a one term government just like that of Dave Barrett's NDP government in B.C.
    If taxpayers do give the cheque book of the province to Adrian Dix on May 14, 2013, he will only have the cheque book until 2017.
    In 2017, he will be voted back to opposition status.
    A new coalition party will form government and then once again have to go in and clean up the mess left by Adrian Dix and take drastic measures just like Bill Bennett of the Social Credit and Gordon Campbell of the Liberals had to do to take the province back to prosperity.
    The NDP are history in Saskatchewan and Ontario. The NDP are the third party in Ontario and hold 17 seats out of a total of 108.
    Before the provincial election of 2011, in Saskatchewan, the NDP, the official opposition party, had 20 seats and after the election had only 9 seats and their leader even lost his seat.
    Imagine, they were the opposition party going into the election and still were slammed by the voters.
    Governments are all the same, but some are better than others.
    It is very comical here in B.C. Presently B.C. is a "HAVE" province and has a AAA- credit rating, second highest in Canada next to Alberta.
    This does not seem to sink into the voters. You have to work to obtain these two accomplishments.
    The major six banks in Canada do not have one AAA rating, reason being they take too many chances in lending out money.
    The election will come shortly. The sad part is that not every taxpayer will cast a ballot and the taxpayer not realizing that they have the final say in who is the government.
    DON'T BLAME NDP PREMIERS OR LIBERAL PREMIERS, BLAME OURSELVES. WE ARE THE ONES THAT GIVE THEM THE JOB.
    A lot of taxpayers seem to forget, that B.C. is an investment province. Investment companies do not believe in NDP governments.
    When a NDP government forms in B.C. the investment company takes it out on their employees. Lay off slips are handed out.
    It seems odd that this is the case, but this is politics. Amazing of how you plan on voting goes right down to the factor, will that pay cheque still be their every second Friday.
    This does not happen with taxpayers employed by the municipal, provincial, and federal governments. Work as usual regardless of who is the provincial government.
    1. MichaelD_10 posted on 02/16/2013 05:58 PM
      @joes_2868 DON'T BLAME NDP PREMIERS OR LIBERAL PREMIERS, BLAME OURSELVES. WE ARE THE ONES THAT GIVE THEM THE JOB.

      I could not agree more.
  10. joes_2868 posted on 02/16/2013 01:24 PM
    bctaxpayer: The readers want you to tell them why is there only 4 elected NDP MLA's in the Alberta provincial legislature?
    Why before the election call in 2011, in Saskatchewan, the NDP, the official opposition party had 20 seats and after the election had only 9 seats, and even the leader lost his seat?
    Yes, Manitoba does have a provincial NDP government. The NDP won re-election in 2011, but as of today, the official opposition party, the Progressive Conservatives are the taxpayers choice if an election was held. Just over a year of re-election. Why the change in taxpayers choice?
    Quebec, New Brunswick, and Prince Edward Island do not have one elected NDP MLA. Why?
    The NDP is the third party in Ontario. The NDP has 17 seats out of 108. Why?
    Newfoundland has 5 NDP seats. Why?
    Nova Scotia has a NDP government which is said to be returned to official opposition status as the Liberals will be elected once again to government. The Nova Scotia NDP will be knowN as a one time wonder, just like that of Dave Barrett's NDP government in B.C. Why?
    In B.C. Glen Clark's NDP government won re-election with only a 3 seat majority over the opposition. Glen went ahead and built fast cat ferries. What gave him the authority to do this with only a 3 seat majority?
    If the NDP was to win the election in B.C., why would they be voted back to official opposition in 2017?

    NOW ANSWER ALL OF THE ABOVE WITHOUT BLOWING A GASKET AND SHOOTING FROM THE HIP!
    1. bctaxpayer posted on 02/16/2013 03:00 PM
      @joes_2868 Firstly tell us shy risk Clark the Milford,photo op queen paid two BC lie beral crimminals 6 Million $$$$$$$. What is risky hiding??????
  11. joes_2868 posted on 02/16/2013 03:21 PM
    bctaxpayer: Firstly tell us about Dave Stupich.

    Just finished reading an article on former NDP premier Mike Harcourt. It was about the Dave Stupich NDP scandal.

    Mr. Harcourt tried to contain the damage by claiming whatever happened in Nanaimo was limited to that riding and had been done by a previouse generation of NDP'er's.

    The government and party was clean he said.

    But the Parks report found otherwise, showing that while Mr. Harcourt had been denying any involvement by the NDP outside Nanaimo, provincial NDP directors, had voted to make a SECRET PAYMENT BACK TO THE NCHS.

    THE PAYMENT WAS MEANT TO COVER UP AN EARLIER TRANSFER OF FUNDS BETWEEN NCHS AND THE NDP.

    NOTHING BUT CORRUPTION UNDER THE NDP!

    Sounds just like a story from the TV show the Untouchables.
  12. BOBF_5970 posted on 02/16/2013 04:28 PM
    try selling your home and you will learn that during the ndp van der scam era they brought us the property transfer tax...thanks for taking our hard earned money, ndp !!!!
    1. TonyB_0924 posted on 02/17/2013 09:13 AM
      @BOBF_5970 Nice rant but it was the Social Credit party back in 1987 that brought in the property transfer tax… they were right wing party of the day
  13. joes_2868 posted on 02/16/2013 04:38 PM
    LeonW: You are doing it right now. 49% plus of the popular vote needed for the NDP to win government. Not much hope in that happening.
    Me a whiner, I don't think so. You NDP'er's just can't stand feedback!
    1. bctaxpayer posted on 02/16/2013 06:54 PM
      @joes_2868 No we cannot stand corruption within the BC lie beral party,appears no end to it,until we turf risky the Milf and the rest of the bandits.
  14. joes_2868 posted on 02/16/2013 05:25 PM
    Remember Paul Ramsey and Joy MacPhail? Well at their time in politics, they laughed off a reporter's request for an apology over the half billion dollar fast ferry mess.
    Elton John notes, "SORRY" not only seems to be the hardest word to say, apparently it is the hardest word to say.
    During their time in politics do think either of them could say SORRY to the taxpayers for:

    Blowing $460 million on three fast ferries

    Not speaking up in caucus and canceling the fast ferry project in 1995, 1996, 1997, 1998, or 1999.

    Future Skytrain cost over runs.

    Glen Clark.

    Lying to voters before the 1996 election about two "balanced" budgets.

    Massive tax increases in the early 1990's.

    Dave Stupich and his stealing from nuns routine.

    Not compensating Nanaimo charities for Dave Stupich.

    The budget deficits. WHAT YEAR?

    All past and future deficits.

    Dale "I'm going to crush a free speech rally in Nanaimo" Lovick.

    Ignoring a legal contract with Carrier Lumber which now may cost taxpayers $150 million in damages.

    Limiting free speech through gag laws and wasting taxpayer money defending unconstitutional gag laws.

    Joan Smallwood's use of taxpayer money to send partisan mailers.

    Cost over runs on the Island Highway.

    Wasting $70 million in taxpayer money over the failed Vancouver Convention Centre project.

    Wasting $400,000-$152 per word-on a photo radar instruction manual.

    Bailing our Skeena Cellulose for $300 million at the expense of both taxpayers and other mill jobs not in government ridings.

    Doubling BC's debt from $17 billion in 1991 to $34.5 billion in 2000.

    Jenny Kwan's London Vacation.

    Spending $2 billion through Forest Renewal BC without a business plan.

    29% pay increases for bureaucrats while running deficits.

    Preventing union pensioners from collecting their pensions if they return to work for a non-union firm.

    Updating to present day, the present NDP opposition have baggage of Adrian Dix, Mike Farnworth, Harry Lali, Bruce Ralston, and Leonard Krog.
    On the outside, the NDP have baggage of Ken280, the readers consultant, a man with a briefcase 50 miles away from home and bctaxpayer.

    Would be much better if all seven of them went to the twilight zone.

    JUST COMPLETE CORRUPTION!
  15. MichaelD_10 posted on 02/16/2013 05:33 PM
    Yes I agree The Liberal leader picked when Campbell resigned was poorly thought out. That said your name calling does you no credit.

    People seem not to see that their opinion of the world is also a confession of character. Ralph Waldo Emerson
    1. MichaelD_10 posted on 02/16/2013 05:50 PM
      @MichaelD_10 Sorry!! pushed the wrong button. This was supposed to be a reply to BCtaxpayer.
  16. joes_2868 posted on 02/16/2013 06:39 PM
    MichaelD_10: Thank you.
showing all comments