• Connect to CKNW
Related Links

NDP leader talks what he considers 'high income'
VANCOUVER/CKNW(AM980)
CKNW News Staff | Email news tips to nwnews@cknw.com
10/24/2012

Adriax Dix has shed a bit more light on what he considers the "high end" of the individual tax bracket.

Speaking in studio with CKNW's Bill Good, he reiterates his position -- that he has to look at the province's budget next spring before he can give a firm figure.

But he says he does not consider $100,000 a year to be a high income.

"We have to look at what the numbers are. I take this issue seriously. It's driven by concerns about the fiscal state of the province, and ensuring that we have fairness. But I think those numbers, the numbers in the 150, 200, 250 range are the ones you'd have to look at. But all of those numbers, even there -- I don't think there's very much tax room."

Dix has also said in the past he will not raise small business taxes, but will move big business rates back to 2008 levels.

On skilled workers, Dix says the premier shows "a lack of regard" in her comments yesterday.

Christy Clark said why train for mining jobs that don't exist yet in B.C.?

Dix calls that an "inadequate" response.

"It's clear, anyway, that the Liberal party doesn't take seriously its responsibility for skills training. Because these projects have been in the works for some time. The premier has been celebrating these projects and saying that those jobs would go to British Columbians for some time, even though she and (Jobs) Minister (Pat) Bell were well aware that they weren't, right?"

Specifically, he says B.C. has to start the training, in the first place, at all levels, and get all stakeholders involved.

Dix was also asked: Does B.C.'s coast belong to British Columbia or does it belong to Canada?

"Where I disgree with Premier Redford and Prime Minister Harper is that for decades people believed it was in the national interest not to have oil supertankers on the north coast of British Columbia. We had a moratorium and that was a national policy right? that was supported overwhelmingly nationally and overwhelmingly in British Columbia. And the reasons for that policy still apply. 

"So you know when people say it's the national interest that we develop the oil sands as quickly as possible, it's also in the national interest that the economy of the coast succeed and survive and not be threatened."


 «  Return to previous page
 »  Send to a friend
Subscribe to channel

Leave a comment:

showing all comments · Subscribe to comments
Comment
  • 21
  1. speakup posted on 10/24/2012 11:57 AM
    $100,000 not HIGH income?
    Is he HIGH?
    1. commonsense posted on 10/24/2012 12:05 PM
      @speakup What's his income? Roughly 100k? He has completely lost touch with the working class now.
    2. ianm_0078 posted on 10/24/2012 12:39 PM
      @speakup In the Lower Mainland there are many, many union workers that are in the $85k-$100k bracket. If Dix picks $100k as the magic number there will be many NDP/Union members upset when their taxes increase to support the left-wing initiatives we will see when the NDP get elected.
  2. DeceitinDrugsD posted on 10/24/2012 12:04 PM
    Actually, given the cost of living, $100,000
    just allows a family of four to live comfortable,
    eat well, operate two proer vehicles and have abit
    money left over for a trip and dinner's out etc. without
    major stress.

    There are many people, who, do manage on less than that
    amount, but, with it comes the worries of enough money
    for emergency situations.
    1. commonsense posted on 10/24/2012 12:06 PM
      @DeceitinDrugsD $100,000 is not high in anywhere else but Vancouver?
  3. DeceitinDrugsD posted on 10/24/2012 12:05 PM
    Actually, given the cost of living, $100,000
    just allows a family of four to live comfortable,
    eat well, operate two proer vehicles and have abit
    money left over for a trip and dinner's out etc. without
    major stress.

    There are many people, who, do manage on less than that
    amount, but, with it comes the worries of enough money
    for emergency situations.
  4. DeceitinDrugsD posted on 10/24/2012 12:05 PM
    Actually, given the cost of living, $100,000
    just allows a family of four to live comfortable,
    eat well, operate two proer vehicles and have abit
    money left over for a trip and dinner's out etc. without
    major stress.

    There are many people, who, do manage on less than that
    amount, but, with it comes the worries of enough money
    for emergency situations.
  5. KenL_6250 posted on 10/24/2012 01:00 PM
    It may not be high to him but it is not your every workers wage, only those in Public Sector are making is obscene $150,000 for eg. The Vancouver Police Chief is not worth $250,000 per year. Penny Bellem is not worth $300,000, this clown at UBC is not worth $650,000 and this wing nut at BCLC is not worth $750,000 for what having his finger up his butt all day, his only job was a waiter at the Keg Restaurants. what do you make on a really good day?
  6. LK_1209 posted on 10/24/2012 01:05 PM
    Dix as leader of the opposition gets north of $150,000.00 per year, plus all the other expenses that they claim.
    1. Ken280 posted on 10/25/2012 04:09 PM
      @LK_1209 Do you know what CC makes now over 190 K! This must be the Liberal brightest and the best! I heard him said even if he taxes the high income earners it would be not generate enough money! as did Ontario only those who make over 500 K. To get a good look at the books then he will tell us before the election. Christy already said she will be taxing big business also 2%, seems everything the NDP does or will do she follows or jumps in before them! you liberals Vampires like it so much! CC and company are so good at s**king the blood out of us with extra fee's and as usual you Liberal supporter say nothing
  7. Harold the Helicopter posted on 10/24/2012 04:33 PM
    Before you complain about 100k as too high an income take some time to think about your post high school years. Did you party your youth away then expect to land an awesome job because you were entitled?
    OR
    Did you spend your time getting some kind of education so that you wouldn't end up with a low paying McJob.
  8. Jartann posted on 10/24/2012 06:21 PM
    Why is it anyone's business what a person makes or to judge if it is too high? Most people in the private sector who make over $100K work damn hard to do so, and often this is the result of years of hard work when they made far less.People have been taught the politics of envy by dimwit school teachers who know zero about economics and tax.

    Mr. DIx has discovered that there re relatively few people who make the high income he worries so much about. And here are some realities:

    -most people who make a high income only do so for a short period of time. A very small number of people are permanently in the top tax bracket. This has been demonstrated in study after study of actual people, in Canada, the US, Europe and New Zealand.

    -people who are capable of making a high income for long periods are often very mobile, which means they can leave. As many did in the 1990's. Others can arrange their affairs to avoid the high taxes-hint for professional athletes-Blaine WA is just 52 KM from Van and there is no state income tax.

    -what Mr Dix is really preparing us for is a higher tax rate on everyone. Government "needs" the money you see.

    -the higher corporate tax rate will backfire, as it always does. Corporations that make a profit and then pay tax can do 2 things with the money-use it to grow the business or pay dividends to shareholders. Included in the latter are pension plans which really need the money as most are underfunded. So, Mr. DIx is against growth and anti pension plan. (PS if you think they pay the profits to executives as a bonus, you are stupid because they would be deducted before taxable income and would be taxed at about 44%)

    -the higher corporate tax will backfire because Canadian companies with multi provincial opeations can lower their provincial tax by just moving executives and regional/head offices to say Alberta-which is what happened in the 1990's.

    Mr Dix is clueless, knows nothing about economics or tax, and his party will run BC into the ground. Which evidently is what about half of the people want so long as they get more "free" government stuff.
  9. rossj_9294 posted on 10/24/2012 08:05 PM
    If Dix thinks making $100,000 a year is not high income, then what exactly does he think someone on minimum wage is doing? At 2080 hours per year at full time it would be just over $21,000 BEFORE being taxed to death.
    1. Ken280 posted on 10/25/2012 04:34 PM
      @rossj_9294 what Mr Dix is really preparing us for is a higher tax rate? Are you one of those economist that did not see the collapse before the last election when Campbell lied and said the deficit will be 495 million! or are you a fortune teller from the past and knows exactly what people are going to do! when a company moves they should stay moved. You want a Government just for you the right wing coalition liberals/cons. More than half of BC is other than you.If you people were good for BC! Why this foreign worker program just so you can cheat the workers of BC into low paying work. unbelievable that you people spew your hatred of an opposing party! You want all of us to support everything that the Libs throw at us! even take Jobs from BC workers.
  10. MikeyM_2 posted on 10/25/2012 05:26 PM
    OK DIX get together with he govt and draft legislation which will become law and stop the damn feds from polluting up the shoreline if thats really what everybody is worried about or is it the usual MONEY...........
showing all comments