• Connect to CKNW
Related Links

Proposed development has Langley Township, Metro at odds
LANGLEY/CKNW (AM980)
Shane Woodford | Email news tips to shane.woodford@corusent.com
9/24/2012

A proposed university district to be built around Trinity Western University has the Township of Langley at loggerheads with Metro Vancouver.

 The regional district says the development proposal in Agricultural Land Reserve violates the new regional growth strategy.

 Langley Township Mayor Jack Froese disagrees.

 "When it comes to regional planning this is one issue and I think it boils down to a legal opinion, a legal definition, they receive legal advice and we receive legal advice so I would rather work through this with them and come to a resolution we are proceeding under our due process in our municipality which we believe is fully within the law and they have a different opinion."

  Froese says local government, not Metro Vancouver, has the final say about what is to be built in the area.

  "Metro Vancouver has taken an opposing view they say that we are in conflict and that we are direct collision with our regional contact statement that is there opinion and they are entitled to it. We are proceeding lawfully and if they choose to seek a court order to quash it, as they did before, if it goes all the way through to fourth reading that is there right but we are not on conflict with them we are just proceeding lawfully."

 Froese says although he would like to work it out with the regional district, a legal battle could be looming.

 "We had a resolution that had passed fourth reading. We had listened to Metro Vancouver and I had asked council to rescind that fourth reading so we could engage all of our neighbouring communities, Metro Vancouver, first nations, the city of Langley, interested parties."

 Froese says Metro Vancouver is failing to factor in a two year transition period for the new regional growth strategy.


 «  Return to previous page
 »  Send to a friend
Subscribe to channel

Leave a comment:

showing all comments · Subscribe to comments
  1. DeceitinDrugsD posted on 09/24/2012 09:48 PM
    Abbotsford has plans to develop a university district
    around UFV and citizens are, also, concerned about plans
    to try to take land out of ALR adjacent to UFV for U-District
    expansion.
    Universities are like a mini city: Do we build amenities arnd the
    Univ. or encourage Univ. students to shop etc. in the cities'
    core. in order to preserve ALR land?
    1. JeanO posted on 09/24/2012 10:20 PM
      @DeceitinDrugsD There's a reason the ALR was created. In the very near future the people living in cities are going to wish like Hell they had more land in the ALR. There are those who promised if they were elected they would preserve the ALR - right Jack Froese?

      I asked Jack directly, during his campaign, if he would take land out of the ALR. He said no he would not and as a farmer himself he knew how important preserving farm land was. What has changed his mind?

      I can understand the business logic to expanding the University footprint but anyone looking to the future should know, you do no one any favours by taking any more land out of the ALR.
  2. JeanO posted on 09/24/2012 09:53 PM
    Good grief! What does it say about a media outlet that has staff who apparently don't know the difference between there and their?
  3. Sam posted on 09/24/2012 10:35 PM
    Unfortunately, you can't have your cake and eat it too. ALR is great, but if it means greater urban sprawl and less "EcoDensity" then do the benefits outweigh the costs? How many blueberry farms does the lower mainland need? Do you want compact, livable mixed use areas, or disparate residential zones separated from commercial areas by highways and farm land? Neither may be particularly ideal, but you have to fit in all these competing interest on a finite plot of land.
showing all comments