• Connect to CKNW
Related Links

Crown loses bid for tougher riot sentences
VANCOUVER/CKNW (AM980)
Laura Baziuk | Email news tips to laura.baziuk@corusent.com
3/19/2013

BC's Criminal Justice Branch has lost its bid for a harsher sentence for two Stanley Cup rioters.


Crown lawyers had argued that Alexander Peepre's 60 days in jail, and Lincoln Williams' 90 days were too lenient.


Peepre had helped overturn a truck during the June 2011 chaos, and later punched a man.


Williams was one of the 'ringleaders' in the violence: vandalizing, overturning and burning the truck, and confronting police.


The BC Court of Appeal has ruled the sentences for both were appropriate.
 


 «  Return to previous page
 »  Send to a friend
Subscribe to channel

Leave a comment:

showing all comments · Subscribe to comments
Comment Like
  • 18
  1. JD_9814 posted on 03/19/2013 12:04 PM
    I can't wait for ChrisM_18 to read this and comment
    1. ChrisM_18 posted on 03/19/2013 03:12 PM
      @JD_9814 For their failure to make it clear to the punks that trashed our city that this behaviour will not be tolerated, the judges handing out these non- sentences are just as culpable and responsible for what happened as those rioting that night.
      I don't know how the judges can face their families at night - they are a disgrace to our country.
  2. RayA_5 posted on 03/19/2013 12:09 PM
    Good to see that our justice system is looking out for the criminals and kicking the victims to the curb. At least you can say they are consistent.
  3. SlimP_9860 posted on 03/19/2013 12:28 PM
    So the Crown gets it, and the BC court of Appeals doesn't. I would bet that if a poll was taken that 99% of the public would agree that those sentences are too lenient.
  4. BOBF_5970 posted on 03/19/2013 12:47 PM
    definitely the courts took a wrong approach for penalties. instead of a slap on the wrist or jail time (which we taxpayers pay for) a better method would have been a monitary penalty. these rioters are in no way paying for the damages incurred. fines from $1000 to $10,000 should be assessed as per individual infraction.
  5. WDW1 posted on 03/19/2013 12:50 PM
    Very disappointing. The court has lost an opportunity to regain at least some public support.
    1. JD_9814 posted on 03/19/2013 02:36 PM
      @WDW1 in your view, what do you see as an appropriate sentence?
  6. AlfredO posted on 03/19/2013 01:46 PM
    Our legal system is a joke. The costs of investigating, arresting and "punishing" these offenders is becoming more than the cost of the damages they inflicted. They all should have been fined in the neighbourhood of $5000 and given conditional senrences that required they pay the fine or have a permanent criminal record. Of course what do I know.I didn't go to university to get in the good old boys club that is our judicial system that continually find ways to drag out the most simple cases. Wait until the Surrey Six get off because of the length of time to go to trial.
  7. StephenG_3 posted on 03/19/2013 04:06 PM
    The Court system and those Judges presiding are a complete joke and an embarrassment to law abiding citizens. Clearly oh clearly the Judges have zero sense of the gravity of lawlessness.

    They, the Judges should all be fired and replaced with qualified legally trained folks that have common sense.
    1. JD_9814 posted on 03/19/2013 04:14 PM
      @StephenG_3 maybe we could put you in charge!
  8. WilliamS_3961 posted on 03/19/2013 04:40 PM
    Actually, you know, I could train a 6 month old chimpanzee to hand out the sentences our Judiciary hands out. Why do we pay these guys/gals $250,000.00 a year for the lousy job they do ?
showing all comments