• Connect to CKNW
Related Links

Public warning about high-risk offender
VANCOUVER/CKNW AM980
Terry Schintz | Email news tips to Terry
1/7/2013

The B-C Corrections branch is issuing a warning about the release of Kayla Bourque.

Bourque is considered a high risk violent offender.

She plans on living in Vancouver.

Authorities say Bourque has an "escalating criminal history", she has offended violently against  people and has tortured animals.

Corrections says she is to be closely monitored by authorities and must abide by no less than 46 court-ordered conditions.

Among them, she has to stay away from parks, animals, children and social networking sites.

Bourque is 23 years old, five feet four inches tall, weighs 130 pounds, is slender with brown eyes and black hair.


 «  Return to previous page
 »  Send to a friend
Subscribe to channel

Leave a comment:

showing all comments · Subscribe to comments
Comment Like
  • 19
  1. AldinaI posted on 01/07/2013 11:34 AM
    If she is a "high risk violent offender" then why is she being released?!
    1. KenS_7191 posted on 01/07/2013 06:26 PM
      @AldinaI It's the law
  2. lican posted on 01/07/2013 11:51 AM
    Here we go again........Ok public, we are releasing a person thats dangerous and almost for certain going to victimize one of you or your family Soooooo? be on the look out? Run away from if seen? ahhhhh, Quit your job's and barricade yourselves in your basements till we tell you its safe?
    Christ almighty! we are told time and time again that our justice system is the envy of the WORLD! Really......?
    I do not blame the police because this day and age they cant buy a frigging coffee without some know it all arm chair quarterback saying they did it wrong. This all started going sideways with the twisted interpretation of that Charter of rights and freedom's!......the issue with that dam thing is this. There is a word missing and it should go at the front.....I'll tell you the word.....It should read " the Charter of RESPONSIBILITIES, Rights and Freedom's" and you only benefit from the latter by satisfying the former. Be a responsible member of society and you reap the rewards of the rest. Is that really a too draconian idea? Could someone find fault with that?

    As you can tell this stuff rots me to the core. All my best too this piece of excrement's next victim.
    1. MichaelD_10 posted on 01/07/2013 12:46 PM
      @lican This all started going sideways with the twisted interpretation of that Charter of rights and freedom's!.....

      This was our good friend Pierre Elliot Trudeau the worst prime minister ever.
    2. AnneH_4 posted on 01/07/2013 12:50 PM
      @lican I have called it the eCharter of Wrongs when it was introduced - I am not the brightest bulb in the box however I saw that this document was terribly flawed

      And of course, if this monster does attack you are not allowed to defend yourself - if you do try to do that thee authorities will charge you

      How bizzaro is this picture!
  3. JamesT_12 posted on 01/07/2013 12:23 PM
    5 foot four inches, 130 pounds

    "SLENDER"

    She's a fat PORKER!!!

    Put her in a pen with a few Pit Bulls if she likes to torture animals.
    1. AnneH_4 posted on 01/07/2013 12:52 PM
      @JamesT_12 No - she might hurt them

      People who are psychos have enormous strenth
    2. michael_4092 posted on 01/07/2013 07:39 PM
      @JamesT_12 awww, now that's not very nice to call her names, is it?
      LOL
  4. DeceitinDrugsD posted on 01/07/2013 12:30 PM
    Yes, if she is a high risk offender, she needs
    treatment, close supervision and clearly has
    mental health issues.

    I, too, ask, why is this sick person being released into
    the publicm, hwen it is clear she is high risk to reoffend
    and victimize innocent others?
    1. michael_4092 posted on 01/07/2013 07:40 PM
      @DeceitinDrugsD .....and where will the money come from to do all that and give her all that help and monitoring?

      That's right, there is nowhere to put her.
  5. SlimP_9860 posted on 01/07/2013 01:12 PM
    Apparently she was a criminology student at SFU, intent on learning how to commit more crimes without getting caught. She came from a Romanian orphanage where children were warehoused in appalling conditions after the reign of Nicolae Ceausescu slaughtered many thousands of people, including her parents. Ceaucescu and his wife were brought to trial and both were found guilty of murder and put to death by firing squad on Christmas Day 1989. What a surprise she turned out like this.
  6. Depp23 posted on 01/07/2013 01:19 PM
    Apparently there are no grounds to keep her locked up. If they could, they would. In the meantime, we need to keep our eyes open.
  7. RegA [deleted] posted on 01/07/2013 05:16 PM
    The problem is not this sick women, it's we who elect a bunch of duds. She just likes the noteriety. She will, no doubt do-in a few cats or dogs, get whacked on the pee pee, then she'll find a 2 year old baby girl. Stick the poor thing in a rubber room, and keep our children and pets safe.
  8. rclr posted on 01/07/2013 06:42 PM
    If this person has been determined to be a significant enough risk that the world has to be warned about her, why isn't she designated a dangerous offender? If she does indeed have mental issues, why isn't she being held because of the risk to herself and others?

    Because there is this propensity to assume that the person has issues that can be treated, instead of accepting that, in fact, some people are just bad/mean/evil. Sometimes, it has nothing to do with growing up in an orphanage or being teased or having a real mental illness. Sometimes, people are just bad.

    Unfortunately, our system lacks the will to hold people responsible for their actions. Instead, the system looks for an excuse and treats the rest of society as one big institution to house the good with the bad.
showing all comments