@ChrisM_18 This was the bill notorious for not actually being about child protection. From Wikipedia (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bill_C-30):

"The bill would have granted authorities new powers to monitor and track the digital activities of Canadians in real-time, required service providers to log information about their customers and turn it over if requested, and made back door entrances mandatory allowing remote access of individuals' electronic information, each without needing a warrant. Documents obtained under the Access to Information Act show that the government desired to use the expanded powers in cases not involving criminality.

The bill did not mention children, or internet predators, other than in its title; critics claimed the "feel-good name" was unrelated to the content of the bill, and chosen simply to "sell legislation to the public". Critics claimed that authorities would likely use the powers to harass peaceful protestors and activists."

As a fellow citizen I hope in future that before supporting issues with catchy titles that threaten what remains of our democracy you'll actually inform yourself about them.