• Connect to CKNW
Related Links

Vancouver pushes for regional policing
VANCOUVER/CKNW (AM980)
Marcella Bernardo | Email news tips to Marcella
1/22/2013

Saying it will save lives and money, Vancouver's Mayor and Police Chief are again expressing their support for a regional police force,  at the risk of upsetting opponents of the idea.

Mayor Gregor Robertson says he'd like to see this issue front and center in the upcoming BC election.

"It would be great to see candidates for the Legislature across the region put their cards on the table. I think that would speak volumes as to what's possible."

Chief Jim Chu admits other police chiefs have been more reluctant, but this is the right thing to do.

"I don't think anyone's saying that we would do what we're doing now. The Vancouver Police Department supports regional policing. We believe it's more efficient and effective."

Premier Christy Clark says she's open to discussing it, but she insists regional policing requires support across Metro Vancouver.

 


 «  Return to previous page
 »  Send to a friend
Subscribe to channel

Leave a comment:

showing all comments · Subscribe to comments
  1. RePete posted on 01/22/2013 06:00 PM
    Despite having grown up in the City of Vancouver, but now on the North Shore, I am very skeptical of letting COV "run the show" in anything, including policing ... Regional policing, sure, but maybe Abbotsford should form the core? The way that COV constantly makes unilateral decisions that affect everyone (e.g. Transportation, use of Stanley Park.).. Mayor Moonbeam and his bunch are the last ones I want with influence over my neighbourhood and taxes. If we had municipal amalgamation, sure, amalgamated policing, but until then, KEEP MOONBEAM OUT.
  2. BieberStoner69 posted on 01/22/2013 06:05 PM
    All issues are related Policing, Mental Health, Addiction, Housing, Parenting
    The Regional Police issue should go to refferendum because we need new policies on policing in BC
  3. BCSkulker posted on 01/23/2013 08:17 AM
    As someone living in Delta, I am very happy with our police force. What’s really nice is that living in a ‘smaller’ community; you have more access to your police, bureaucrats and politicians than you would in a large metropolis. You actually have a “sense of community” here in Delta; unlike in Vancouver.

    The closer the taxpayer is to government, the more access and influence the taxpayer has. Look at how one citizen has any influence over decisions made by the BC Government. It’s even less with the Federal Government. It’s painfully obvious; the bigger the institution, the less control the individual has.

    In the Federal milieu, even the whole Province of BC has little influence. Decisions are generally made to serve and satisfy Quebec and Ontario; the two population centres of this country. That’s where the votes are. This is also why many pushed for a Triple E senate a few years ago; thank you to the traitors in the Reform Party on that one. Hope you all enjoy those MP pensions you promised not to take.

    I say yes to coordination of policing efforts WHEN NEEDED. I say NO to our police force being diluted and controlled by Vancouver, or any other large population centre, for the day to day operations. Our Delta ‘cops’ generally do an excellent job for their community. If you’re happy with the megalomaniac, Mayor Moonbeam, and his ilk, keep him; we don’t want or need this little socialist controlling any aspect of our community; especially our police.
  4. Starlight711 posted on 01/23/2013 01:28 PM
    OK. I'm confused... Regionalizing police services does have its merits but if the mayors were truly interested in saving money, they would requesting two things.

    First being the regionalization of all the fire services in the lower mainland. This in itself eliminates the geographical boundaries of every municipality. In other words, firefighters could go anywhere in the lower mainland during their shift as the need arises. It eliminates the duplication in staffing that presently exists and duplication of administration to support it. For example, Queensbough has 3 different fire departments serving it where only one is necessary. Hazmat, High angle rescue and all other specialty teams could be shared, again reducing duplication.

    The second being that the municipalities demand that the provincial government fulfill its obligation and provide adequate ambulance service for the lower mainland. Lets face it. Firefighters are not paramedics. They act as first responders with limited medical training to assist the ambulance service. If there was adequate ambulance coverage, fire service call volumes will drop significantly (as much as 65% in some communities), thus reducing the wear and tear on fire equipment. Paramedics are paid a lot less than firefighters, Paramedics respond in teams of two in an ambulance instead of four firefighters on a fire truck. Fire trucks costs 7 to 10 times that of an ambulance and are not capable of transporting patients. It has been proven through may studies that less than 5% of medical calls are actually time sensitive. An example of a time sensitive call would be cardiac arrest.

    100s of millions of dollars could be saved by regionalizing the fire services without any lay offs or sacrificing present fire protection. Within the US most major cities are looking or changing fire service delivery because of its huge costs. It's time to streamline and reduce waste and redundancy within the fire services too!
  5. joes_2868 posted on 01/23/2013 03:34 PM
    Wait until Ken280, the readers consultant, a man with a briefcase 50 miles away from home, blows a gasket, shoots from the hip and tells us readers which the best solution is. THAT ALWAYS MAKES HIS DAY!
showing all comments