You see,this is exactly what the nap will fix in2013. This "proves" that the rich are getting richer and that their "share" of income is growing. And at the expense of the poor, some Dix would say. Let the "redistribution" of income start with the Canucks. You mean the players would leave? Bot, no one else, of course. The nap argument is tat burrows income comes at someone else's expense